Day Three to Go.
On Day Two we compared the "Stanford-Way" of "DINKINIG" at the D-School, referring to these major steps of development:
— Core Idea
— Defining Details / Features
.... and again, we start with: "Problem" again
We managed to identify these specific initiators / triggers / Influencers:
19-02-23: For today the aim is to identify...
— subjects, themes, ideas to work with
— the students groups as well as individuals who will tackle these
— the framework for the upcoming sessions as indicated here:
19-03-01: Design-Thinking @ bbw HM029 (IV)
Testing and evaluating your proposals
(in group centric trials using the "Dinking" methodology
19-03-15: Design-Thinking @ bbw HM029 (V)
Online-Evaluation of HM020 by the students present;
Presenting your projects
(with ore without internal/external audience and judges?)
2019-03-15/18: These are the deadlines for the delivery:
— the presentation-software and -results have to be delivered offline on Friday, 15th
— the paper, script, thesis... may be ’refurbished’ during the week-end but has to be delivered by mail on Monday, 18th. the latest. Any further delay, by whatever reasons soever, will not be accepted.
19-03-16: Design-Thinking @ bbw HM029 (VI)
Evaluation of the presentations, and celebrating a common exercise (like preparing, presenting and sharing food )
This paper is a pretext to learn to deal with the tools helpful or even necessary for writing a master-thesis. But it has not to be a copycat for this presentation (it could be an abstract, a "making-of-paper", a commented illustration of the slides used, ...).
If the presentation / paper is conceived and disigned and written and presented by more than on person, evidence has to be declared and shown who did what.
Here, as a reminder, the
As as reminder here are some guidelines for the presentations, assembled on at the 2nd. session, February, 22nd. 2019 and agreed today:
— The presentation is the result of the design thinking process.
— The students present are a challenging- and dialogue-partner for each presenter during the process of development.
— The process of finding the theme and designing the framework is part of the work that may be presented.
— It is allowed to present a project / projects, an idea /ideas, even an intuition - not yet ready for print and execution, but ready for discussion - as long the application of the "Dinking" methodology will be obvious.
— It has to be comprehensive even for those, who are not specialists in the field.
— It is not necessary to present a traditional complete design-concept. It is allowed and even fostered to use the idea of "design" as part of complete rethinking concept.
— You don’t fail because you present a process that failed. But do show us, how you managed this process and what kind of obstacles hampered you to be successful.
— The most difficult challenge of this project is the chance to create something you’ve really dreamed of.
Design-Thinking @ bbw HM029 (I)
Design Thinking & Idea Development (HM022) II
Design Thinking & Idea Development (I)
Design Thinking SS 2017 (3)
Design Thinking & Idea Development (V)
Design Thinking & Idea Development (III)
Design Thinking & Idea Development (II)
Ästhetik & Design Thinking (V)
Ästhetik - Design - Denken (III)
Ästhetik - Design - Denken (I)
Digitising Europe, Berlin, 19-02-19
Digital Live Design, DLD, Munich, 19-02-19/20/21/22
d.confestival, Potsdam, 17-09-14/15